Developments of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for wastewater treatment in abroad
Received date: 2002-06-02
Online published: 2010-10-01
Developments of membrane bioreactors (MBR) for wastewater treatment in foreign countrie are thoroughly reviewed. The scale and amount of MBR applied to wastewater treatment are expanding, however, membrane fouling is mainly the abstructive factor of applying MBR further to wastewater treatment. It is noted that air sparging in hollow fibre module is efficient for ameliorating membrane fouling,though there are many countermeasures of membrane fouling in MBR. The cost analysis shows that the application of MBR may be much cheaper in small/midscale wastewater treatment plants, but conventional activated sludge processes are more suitable for largescale wastewater treatment plants. The molecular biological technique allows us to study microbial community of membrane bioreactors at the genetic level.
Key words: membrane bioreactors; wastewater treatment; activated sludge
Wei Yuansong, Zheng Xiang, Liu Junxin . Developments of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for wastewater treatment in abroad[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2003 , 23(1) : 1 -7 . DOI: 10.11894/1005-829x.2003.23(1).1
[1] Visvanathan C, Aim R B, Parameshwaran K. Membrane separation bioreactors for wastewater treatment[J].Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2000, 30(1): 1-48
[2] Stephenson T. Types of membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment-An introduction[C].Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting on Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment,Cranfield University, Cranfild,UK,1997
[3] Stephenson T,Judd S, Jefferson B,et al. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment[M].London: IWA Publishing, 2000.59-111
[4] Cté P, Thompson D. Wastewater treatment using membranes: the North American experience[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 209-215
[5] Cté P,Buisson H, Praderie M. Immersed membranes activated sludge process applied to the treatment of municipal wastewater[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 1998, 38(4-5): 437-442
[6] Gunder B, Krauth K. Replacement of secondary clarification by membrane separation-results with plate and hollow fibre modules[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 1998, 38(4-5): 383-393
[7] Holler S, Trsch W. Treatment of urban wastewater treatment in a membrane bioreactor at high organic loading rates[J].Journal of Biotechnology, 2001,92: 95-101
[8] Cicek N,Macomber J, Davel J, et al. Effect of solids retention on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2001, 43(11): 43-50
[9] Yoon S H,Kim H S,Park J K,et al. Influence of important operational parameters on performance of a membrane biological reactor[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 235-242
[10] Chiemchaisri. Enhancement of organic oxidation and nitrogen removal in membrane separation bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment[D].Ph.D. thesis, Department of Urban Engineering, University of Tokyo, Japan, 1993
[11] Seo G T, Lee T S, Moon B H,et al. Two stage intermittent aeration membrane bioreactor for simultaneous organic, nitrogen and phosphorus removal[J].Wat. Sci. Tech.,2000,41(10-11): 217-225
[12] Murakami T, Usui J, Takamura K,et al. Application of immersed-type membrane separation activated sludge process to municipal wastewater treatment[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 295-301
[13] Field R W, Wu D,Howell J A,et al. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1995, 100: 259-272.
[14] Defrance,Jaffrin. Comparison between filtrations at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1999, 152: 203-210
[15] Bouhbila E H,Aim R B,Buisson H. Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors[J].Separation and Purification Technology, 2001, 22-23:123-132
[16] Koros W J, Ma Y H,Shimizu T. Terminology for membranes and membrane processes-IUPAC recommendations 1996[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1996, 120: 149-159
[17] Roorda J H,J H J M van der Graaf. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2001, 43(10): 241-248
[18] Tomas H,Judd S, Murrer J. Fouling characteristics of membrane filtration in membrane bioreactors[J].Membrane Technology, 2001, 122:10-13
[19] Tardieu E,Grasmick A,Geaugey V,et al. Hydrodynamic control of bioparticle deposition in a MBR applied to wastewater treatment[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1998, 147: 1-12
[20] Wisniewski C,Grasmick A. Floc size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling[J].Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1998, 138: 403-411
[21] Chang I S, Kim J S,Lee C H. The effects of EPS on membrane fouling in a MBR process[C].Cranfield University, UK,2001. 19-28
[22] Defrance L,Jaffrin M Y,Gupta B,et al. Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling[J].Bioresource Technology, 2000, 73: 105-112
[23] Carroll T,Booker N A. Axial features in the fouling of hollow-fibre membranes[J].J. Memb. Sci., 2000, 168: 203-212
[24] Knops F N M, Futselaar H,Rácz I G. The transversal flow microfiltration module. Theory, design, realization and experiments[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1992, 73: 153-161
[25] Chang S,Fane A G. The effect of fibre diameter on filtration and flux distribution-Relevance to submerged hollow fibre modules[J].J. Memb. Sci., 2001, 184(2): 221-231
[26] Fane A G, Chang S. The performance of hollow fibre membranes for biomass filtration[C].Cranfield University, UK, 2001. 14-18
[27] Chang I S,Judd S J. Air sparging of a submerged MBR for municipal wastewater treatment[J].Process Biochemistry, 2002, 37: 915-920
[28] Wilkes S,Brindle K,Passe D,et al. The preliminary evaluation of a submerged membrane bioreactor based on large diameter hollow fibre membranes for treatment of raw sewage[C].The 2nd Symposium on Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment,Cranfield University, UK,1999
[29] Judd S. Novel MBR for the treatment of raw sewage[J].Filtration+Separation,2000,(10):34-36
[30] Fane A G, Beatson P, Li H. Membrane fouling and its control in environmental applications[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 303-308
[31] Vigneswaran S, Kwon D Y,Ngo H H,et al. Improvement of microfiltration performance in water treatment: is critical flux a viable solution[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2001, 41(10-11): 309-315
[32] Defrance,Jaffrin. Reversibility of fouling formed in activated sludge filtration[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1999, 157:73-84
[33] Kwon D Y,Vigneswaran S,Fane A G,et al. Experimental determination of critical flux in cross-flow microfiltration[J].Separation and Purification Technology, 2000, 19: 169-181
[34] Tardieu E,Grasmick A,Geaugey V,et al. Influence of hydrodynamics on fouling velocity in a recirculated MBR for wastewater treatment[J].J. Memb. Sci., 1999, 156: 131-140
[35] Bouhbila E H,Aim R B,Buisson H. Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment)[J].Desalination, 1998, 118: 315-322
[36] Judd S J,Le-Clech P,Taha T,et al. Theoretical and experimental representation of a submerged MBR system[C].Cranfield University, UK,2001. 1-13
[37] Verberk J Q J C,Worm G I M,Futselaar H,et al. Combined air-water flush in dead-end ultrafiltration[J]. Wat. Sci. Tech.: Water Supply, 2001, 1(5/6): 393-402
[38] Cicek N,France J P,Suidan M T,et al. Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated-sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high-molecular-weight compounds[J].Water Environment Research, 1999, 71(1): 64-70
[39] Gunder B. The membrane-coupled activated sludge process in municipal wastewater treatment[M].Technomic Publishing Co., Inc. USA, 2001
[40] Wei Y S.Sludge reduction in membrane bioreactor (MBR) and conventional activated sludge (CAS) processes with Oligochaeta[R]. TNO report,Netherland:TNO Environment, Energy and Process Innovation, the Netherlands,2002
[41] Witzig R,Manz W, Rosenberger S,et al. Microbiological aspects of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal wastewater[J]. Wat. Res., 2002, 36: 394-402
[42] Luxmy B S,Nakajima F,Yamamoto K. Analysis of bacterial community in membrane-separation bioreactors by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 259-268
[43] Muller E B,Stouthamer A H,Verseveld H W van,et al. Aerobic domestic waste water treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by cross-flow filtration[J].Wat. Res., 1995, 29(4):1 179-1 189
[44] Rosenburger S,Kraume M,Szewzyk U. Sludge free management of membrane bioreactors[C]. The 2nd Symposium on Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment,Cranfield University, UK.1999
[45] Rosenberger S,Witzig R,Manz W,et al. Operation of different membrane bioreactors: experimental results and physiological state of the microgrganisms[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 269-277
[46] Rosenberger S,Kruger U, Witzig R,et al. Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal wastewater[J].Wat. Res., 2002,(36):413-420
[47] Wagner J,Rosenwinkel K H. Sludge production in membrane bioreactors under different conditions[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2000, 41(10-11): 251-258
[48] Wilderer P A,Bungartz H J,Lemmer H,et al. Modern scientific methods and their potential in wastewater science and technology[J].Wat. Res., 2002, 36: 370-393
[49] Adham S,Gagllardo P,Boulos L,et al. Feasibility of the membrane bioreactor process for water reclamation[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 2001, 43(10): 203-209
[50] Churchouse,Wildgoose. Membrane bioreactor hit the big time-from lab to full-scale application[C]. The 2nd Symposium on Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment,Cranfield University, UK,1999
[51] Davis W J,Le M S,Heath C R. Intensified activated sludge process with submerged membrane microfiltration[J].Wat. Sci. Tech., 1998, 38(4-5): 421-428
/
〈 | 〉 |