Analysis of DOM characteristics in produced water of foam drainage wells in Fuling shale gas field

doi:10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2022-0481

Abstract

Abstract:

Foam drainage produced water（PW） is the gas well effluent that generate during the stimulation process of gas production in Fuling shale gas field. Compared with the conventional shale gas PW before the stimulation， the organic content in the foam drainage PW is significantly increased，posing an elevated risk to the environment.There is a lack of understanding of organic pollutant composition characteristics of such PW. The chemical characteristics of PW from foam drainage gas were investigated in detail in terms of water quality， two-dimensional fluorescence spectra and molecular composition of dissolved organic matter（DOM）， respectively， using the PW from ordinary shale gas in the same region as a control. The results showed that the COD_Cr and ammonia nitrogen concentrations in the PW of foam drainage increased significantly， and the acute toxicity spiked. Two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy analysis showed that the increase of organic matter content in ordinary PW was mainly related to protein-like organic matter， while the foam drainage PW contained more humic substances. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry was used to detect the DOM composition of the two types of PW， and the results showed that DOM of the foam drainage PW was relatively high in fat and protein-like organic matter， with a higher overall saturation of organic matter， a more complex molecular composition， and fewer oxygen-containing functional groups， which were less likely to oxidation. Therefore， it is necessary to pay more attention to environmental risk of Foam drainage PW， as well as to effective reduction of refractory organics in the process of PW treatment and reuse.

Key words: shale gas, foam drainage gas, produced water, dissolved organic matter

摘要：

泡排产出水是涪陵页岩气田气井增产过程中出现的气井污水。与增产前的普通页岩气产出水相比，泡排产出水中的有机物含量显著增加，潜在环境风险加大。目前对此类产出水的有机污染物组成特征的认识还十分缺乏。以同一区域普通页岩气产出水为对照，分别从水质、二维荧光光谱和溶解性有机物（DOM）分子组成特征方面，详细研究了泡排产出水的化学特性。结果显示：泡排产出水的COD_Cr与氨氮含量明显升高，急性毒性激增；二维荧光光谱分析表明，普通产出水的有机物含量上升主要与类蛋白质有机物有关，而泡排产出水相比普通产出水含有更多的腐殖质；采用傅立叶变换离子回旋共振质谱对两类产出水的DOM组成进行检测，分析结果显示泡排产出水的DOM中脂肪类和蛋白质有机物相对偏高，有机物总体饱和度更高，分子组成更为复杂，且含氧官能团较少，更不易被氧化。因此，需要更加关注泡排产出水的环境风险，在产出水的处理与回用过程中重视难降解有机物的有效削减。

关键词: 页岩气, 泡排采气, 产出水, 溶解性有机物

CLC Number:

TE992.2

Qiyue KUANG, Yan CUI, Zexu ZHENG, Zhaoji ZHANG. Analysis of DOM characteristics in produced water of foam drainage wells in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2023, 43(4): 154-161.

邝绮玥, 崔艳, 郑泽旭, 张召基. 涪陵页岩气田泡排气井产出水中DOM特征分析[J]. 工业水处理, 2023, 43(4): 154-161.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://www.iwt.cn/EN/10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2022-0481

https://www.iwt.cn/EN/Y2023/V43/I4/154

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

1	O'DONNELL M C， GILFILLAN S M V， EDLMANN K，et al. Wastewater from hydraulic fracturing in the UK： assessing the viability and cost of management［J］. Environmental Science： Water Research & Technology，2018，4（2）： 325-335. doi:10.1039/c7ew00474e
2	FEI Y， JOHNSON R L， GONZALEZ M，et al. Experimental and numerical investigation into nano-stabilized foams in low permeability reservoir hydraulic fracturing applications［J］. Fuel，2018，213（3）： 133-143. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.095
3	QIU J， LÜ F， ZHANG H，et al. Data mining strategies of molecular information for inspecting wastewater treatment by using UHRMS［J］. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry，2021，31： e00134. doi:10.1016/j.teac.2021.e00134
4	DITTMAR T， KOCH B， HERTKORN N，et al. A simple and efficient method for the solid-phase extraction of dissolved organic matter （SPE-DOM） from seawater［J］. Limnology and Oceanography： Methods，2008，6（6）： 230-235. doi:10.4319/lom.2008.6.230
5	MARSHALL A G， HENDRICKSON C L， JACKSON G S. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry： A primer［J］. Mass Spectrometry Reviews，1998，17（1）： 1-35. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2787(1998)17:1<1::aid-mas1>3.0.co;2-k
6	BOTTA-DUKÁT Z. Rao's quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits［J］. Journal of Vegetation Science，2005，16（5）： 533-540. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02393.x
7	GEITNER R， FRITZSCH R， POPP J，et al. corr2D： Implementation of two-dimensional correlation analysis in R［J］. Journal of Statistical Software，2019，90（3）：1-33. doi:10.18637/jss.v090.i03
8	MENTGES A， FEENDERS C， SEIBT M，et al. Functional molecular diversity of marine dissolved organic matter is reduced during degradation［J］. Frontiers in Marine Science，2017，4：194. doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00194
9	RIEDEL T， BIESTER H， DITTMAR T. Molecular fractionation of dissolved organic matter with metal salts［J］.Environmental Science & Technology，2012，46（8）： 4419-4426. doi:10.1021/es203901u
10	GREGORY K B， VIDIC R D， DZOMBAK D A. Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing［J］. Elements，2011，7（3）： 181-186. doi:10.2113/gselements.7.3.181
11	ESTRADA J M， BHAMIDIMARRI R. A review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing［J］. Fuel，2016，182（20）： 292-303. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.051
12	ROSENBLUM J， THURMANE M， FERRER I，et al. Organic chemical characterization and mass balance of a hydraulically fractured well： From fracturing fluid to produced water over 405 days［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2017，51（23）： 14006-14015. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b03362
13	董大忠，高世葵，黄金亮，等. 论四川盆地页岩气资源勘探开发前景［J］. 天然气工业，2014，34（12）： 1-15. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.001
	DONG Dazhong， GAO Shikui， HUANG Jinliang，et al. A discussion on the shale gas exploratiton& development prospect in the Sichuan Basin［J］. Natural Gas Industry，2014，34（12）： 1-15. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.001
14	KAHRILAS G A， BLOTEVOGEL J， CORRIN E R，et al. Downhole transformation of the hydraulic fracturing fluid biocide glutaraldehyde： Implications for flowback and produced water quality［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2016，50（20）：11414-11423. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02881
15	HE Y， FLYNN S L， FOLKERTS E J，et al. Chemical and toxicological characterizations of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water［J］. Water Research，2017，114（7）：78-87. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.027
16	NODA I. Frontiers of two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy. Part 1. New concepts and noteworthy developments［J］. Journal of Molecular Structure，2014，1069（12）： 3-22. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.01.025
17	LI Y， FANG Z， HE C，et al. Molecular characterization and transformation of dissolved organic matter in refinery wastewater from water treatment processes： Characterization by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry［J］. Energy & Fuels，2015，29（11）： 6956-6963. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01446
18	YANG J， LI W， ZHU Q，et al. Identification，Formation and predicted toxicity of halogenated DBPs derived from tannic acid and its biodegradation products［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2019，53（22）：13019-13030. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03073
19	ZHAO X， WU Y， ZHANG X，et al. Ozonation as an efficient pretreatment method to alleviate reverse osmosis membrane fouling caused by complexes of humic acid and calcium ion［J］. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering，2019，13（4）：55. doi:10.1007/s11783-019-1139-y
20	TANENTZAP A J， FITCH A， ORLAND C，et al. Chemical and microbial diversity covary in fresh water to influence ecosystem functioning［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences，2019，116（49）： 24689-24695. doi:10.1073/pnas.1904896116
21	FERRER I， THURMAN E M. Analysis of hydraulic fracturing additives by LC/Q-TOF-MS［J］. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry，2015，407（21）： 6417-6428. doi:10.1007/s00216-015-8780-5
22	LUEK J L， GONSIOR M. Organic compounds in hydraulic fracturing fluids and wastewaters： A review［J］. Water Resrarch，2017，123（16）： 536-548. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.012

序号	性质	完钻井深/m	pH	总氮/（mg·L^-1）	氨氮/（mg·L^-1）	硝态氮/（mg·L^-1）	亚硝态氮/（mg·L^-1）	总磷/（mg·L^-1）	Cl^-/（g·L^-1）	COD_Cr/（mg·L^-1）	TOC/（mg·L^-1）	TDS/（g·L^-1）	Sb/（mg·L^-1）	急性毒性/%
A	普通	5 415	6.06	89.37	69.07	14.70	0.02	0.29	17.29	1 515.83	74.91	40.31	58.71	31.70
B		4 901	6.20	64.30	47.75	6.34	0.01	0.00	11.83	146.12	30.46	24.34	48.91	41.42
C		5 060	5.90	73.43	57.13	7.46	0.02	0.29	11.50	2 80.80	38.61	24.62	51.27	31.96
D	泡排	5 150	5.92	91.80	80.33	15.95	0.01	0.34	15.11	1 641.33	328.90	36.31	64.21	99.94
E		4 415	6.50	200.13	95.41	20.88	0.17	0.34	9.41	4 746.50	2 360.58	25.92	61.22	96.39
F		4 919	6.31	80.43	59.60	11.47	0.03	0.44	13.66	474.80	141.32	28.44	65.39	82.72

序号	性质	完钻井深/m	pH	总氮/（mg·L^-1）	氨氮/（mg·L^-1）	硝态氮/（mg·L^-1）	亚硝态氮/（mg·L^-1）	总磷/（mg·L^-1）	Cl^-/（g·L^-1）	COD_Cr/（mg·L^-1）	TOC/（mg·L^-1）	TDS/（g·L^-1）	Sb/（mg·L^-1）	急性毒性/%
A	普通	5 415	6.06	89.37	69.07	14.70	0.02	0.29	17.29	1 515.83	74.91	40.31	58.71	31.70
B		4 901	6.20	64.30	47.75	6.34	0.01	0.00	11.83	146.12	30.46	24.34	48.91	41.42
C		5 060	5.90	73.43	57.13	7.46	0.02	0.29	11.50	2 80.80	38.61	24.62	51.27	31.96
D	泡排	5 150	5.92	91.80	80.33	15.95	0.01	0.34	15.11	1 641.33	328.90	36.31	64.21	99.94
E		4 415	6.50	200.13	95.41	20.88	0.17	0.34	9.41	4 746.50	2 360.58	25.92	61.22	96.39
F		4 919	6.31	80.43	59.60	11.47	0.03	0.44	13.66	474.80	141.32	28.44	65.39	82.72

序号	性质	C_wa	m/z_wa	H/C_wa	O/C_wa	DBE_wa
A	普通	10.39	214.87	1.09	0.48	5.61
B		10.65	228.58	1.47	0.48	3.68
C		9.15	187.36	0.90	0.48	5.76
D	泡排	14.63	279.23	1.44	0.34	3.83
E		15.03	296.16	2.02	0.23	1.05
F		14.18	277.78	1.46	0.35	3.74

序号	性质	C_wa	m/z_wa	H/C_wa	O/C_wa	DBE_wa
A	普通	10.39	214.87	1.09	0.48	5.61
B		10.65	228.58	1.47	0.48	3.68
C		9.15	187.36	0.90	0.48	5.76
D	泡排	14.63	279.23	1.44	0.34	3.83
E		15.03	296.16	2.02	0.23	1.05
F		14.18	277.78	1.46	0.35	3.74

[1]	Qiuyu LI, Ke YUAN, Jin YUAN, Yang LI, Zhongyuan REN, Xiaojiao LI. Study on the effect of coagulation treatment on dissolved organic pollutants in coal mine water [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2025, 45(3): 152-156.
[2]	Quanfa ZHONG, Lin ZHONG, Guohui XU, Qinghai JIN, Jin YU, Fei XU, Di HE. Unravelling molecular transformation of dissolved organic matter in the full quantization treatment of landfill leachate concentrate [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2025, 45(2): 109-117.
[3]	Ji’na SONG, Wen YUE, Xiao TONG, Lanzhou XU, Yadong WANG, Yabo SHANG, Xin JIN, Pengkang JIN. Dissolved ozone flotation-nucleation crystallization pelleting process for the treatment and reclamation of oil and gas field produced water [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2025, 45(1): 159-166.
[4]	Wei WANG, Xu BAI, Xiaodan CHU, Xiang ZHAO, Xueliang MA, Wei LIN, Cheng GONG, Jiuyang YU. The motion law of oil droplets and bubbles in air flotation-cyclone [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2025, 45(1): 115-122.
[5]	Shugang YANG, Qingji WANG, Kunfeng ZHANG, Hongkun CHEN, Shuangxing LIU, Mingyu CAI, Yilin WANG. Key challenges and countermeasures for treatment and disposal of gas field produced water in China [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2024, 44(8): 13-20.
[6]	Liang XIE, Shutong SHI, Shuai ZHENG, Junwei WU, Xin'ge SUN, Qi ZHANG, Pingping YANG, Yubin ZENG. Experiment and mechanism analysis of electrocoagulation for high temperature super-heavy oil produced water [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2024, 44(6): 101-110.
[7]	Wanjin HU, Yang QU, Yan WU, Wenshi LIU, Xing WANG, Xuemei WANG. Variations in dissolved organic matter during wastewater treatment in natural gas purification plants [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2024, 44(5): 164-170.
[8]	Shenfa AN, Zhiyong LUAN, Yang WANG, Xiaoqiang CHEN, Xianlei FENG, Aiwu PENG, Lingzhi ZHAO. Analysis on application of electromagnetic oil-water separation in oilfield [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2023, 43(6): 91-98.
[9]	Kang DU, Yongguo LIU, Ping GUO, Zhigang CHEN, Jinsheng MU, Kai HUANG, Chen WANG. Evaluation of damage mechanism of gas field produced water based on nuclear magnetic resonance technology [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2023, 43(5): 149-157.
[10]	Demin YANG, Ye ZHANG, Jianmei YUAN, Yiping WANG, Taotao KAN. Advanced treatment of fracturing wastewater by electroflocculation hybrid with micro-bubble ozone oxidation process [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2023, 43(12): 109-113.
[11]	Weicheng ZHENG,Qingqing WANG,Zhongquan WANG,Shulin QIN. Experimental study of microelectrolysis coupled with Fenton oxidation for treatment of coalbed methane produced water [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2023, 43(1): 131-136.
[12]	Jie YANG, Jing LI, Dong LIN, Chengjun ZHAO. Research and application of the high efficiency recycling technology for fracturing flowback fluid [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(9): 175-184.
[13]	Ao ZHANG, Hao WANG, Fan RAN, Linjing ZHANG, Ziwei CHEN, Hongyang REN. Research on electrodialysis desalination technology for shale gas fracturing flowback fluid [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(8): 102-107.
[14]	Ji’na SONG, Juncheng WANG, Wen YUE. Reactivity characteristics of dissolved secondary effluent organic matter with aluminum coagulants [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(7): 95-100.
[15]	Jie PENG, Yonggang TIAN, Junjun MA, Ronghua HE. Optimization of produced water containing fracturing flowback fluid treatment process [J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(5): 157-162.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export