Response surface methodology to optimize resin adsorption of 2-amino-4-acetamidoanisole

doi:10.11894/iwt.2020-0881

Abstract

Abstract:

The response surface method based on single factor experiment was used to optimize the resin adsorption to remove the 2-amino-4-acetamidoanisole(AMA) in a dyeing wastewater from a company in Ningxia. Results showed that after resin adsorption, the AMA was significantly reduced from 1.64×10⁶ μg/L until it was undetectable. In addition, there were obvious interactions among temperature, pH and flow rate in the process of AMA removal. The optimized condition of the process was as follows: flow rate of the adsorption solution 1.84 mL/min, pH 4.39, and the temperature 23.08℃.

Key words: dyeing wastewater, 2-amino-4-acetamidoanisole, resin adsorption, response surface methodology

摘要：

以宁夏某染化公司印染废水为研究对象，采用树脂吸附法对废水中的2-氨基-4-乙酰氨基苯甲醚进行处理，利用基于单因素实验的响应面法对处理条件进行了优化。实验结果表明，树脂吸附可将废水中2-氨基-4-乙酰氨基苯甲醚的质量浓度由1.64×10⁶ μg/L降低至不可检出，且在去除还原物过程中温度、pH和流速3个因素两两交互作用明显，优化工艺条件：吸附液流速1.84 mL/min，pH 4.39，温度23.08℃。

关键词: 印染废水, 2-氨基-4-乙酰氨基苯甲醚, 树脂吸附, 响应面法

CLC Number:

X703

Peng Zhang,Hong Liu,Houwang Chen,Shiqing Ye,Meng Chen,Liuliu Yang. Response surface methodology to optimize resin adsorption of 2-amino-4-acetamidoanisole[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2021, 41(6): 196-201.

张鹏,刘宏,陈厚望,叶仕青,陈猛,杨留留. 响应曲面法优化树脂吸附2-氨基-4-乙酰氨基苯甲醚[J]. 工业水处理, 2021, 41(6): 196-201.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://www.iwt.cn/EN/10.11894/iwt.2020-0881

https://www.iwt.cn/EN/Y2021/V41/I6/196

Figures/Tables 10

References 17

1	陈红, 李响, 薛罡, 等. 当前印染废水治理中的关键问题[J]. 工业水处理, 2015, 35 (10): 16- 19. doi: 10.11894/1005-829x.2015.35(10).016
2	Tan K B , Vakili M , Horri B A , et al. Adsorption of dyes by nanomaterials: Recent developments and adsorption mechanisms[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 150, 229- 242. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.07.009
3	Yao Tong , Guo Song , Zeng Changfeng , et al. Investigation on efficient adsorption of cationic dyes on porous magnetic polyacrylamide microspheres[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 292, 90- 97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.014
4	肖刚, 杨新玮, 孙朝晖, 等. 世界染料品种——2005年[J]. 全国染料工业信息中心, 2005, 577- 606.
5	Karthikeyan S , Gupta V K , Boopathy R , et al. A new approach for the degradation of high concentration of aromatic amine by heterocatalytic Fenton oxidation: Kinetic and spectroscopic studies[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2012, 173, 153- 163. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2012.06.022
6	张欣欣. 染整废水处理技术的探讨[J]. 纺织报告, 2019, (11): 21- 23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6289.2019.11.010
7	王家宾, 马乐, 张凯, 等. 印染废水生物处理的研究现状及发展[J]. 染整技术, 2019, 41 (7): 43- 46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9350.2019.07.011
8	常思淼. 石灰混凝法处理2-氨基-4-乙酰氨基苯甲醚生产废水实验研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学.
9	方玲. 树脂吸附法处理3-硝基-4-甲氧基乙酰苯胺废水的研究[D]. 马鞍山: 安徽工业大学, 2017.
10	安雅琦, 王惠丰, 史克威. 大孔树脂吸附处理苯胺废水及再生方法试验研究[J]. 煤炭加工与综合利用, 2017, (10): 65- 67. URL
11	朱连燕, 王玉明, 周幸福. 响应曲面法优化电催化降解染料废水工艺的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71 (3): 1335- 1342. URL
12	陈磊, 张杰, 龙琦, 等. Ce-Mn/Al₂O₃-H₂O₂催化氧化皮革废水的研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39 (3): 730- 736. URL
13	王嘉豪, 马云超, 马敬环, 等. PAC-PPFC复合混凝预处理酮连氮法制肼废水[J]. 水处理技术, 2019, 45 (9): 29- 34. URL
14	环保部联合质检总局. 环保部联合质检总局发布《纺织染整工业水污染物排放标准》(GB 4287-2012)修改单[J]. 染整技术, 2015, (5): 3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9350.2015.05.002
15	陈俊, 吴妍蓓, 金杰, 等. 响应面法应用于臭氧处理偶氮废水优化研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41 (8): 146- 152. URL
16	Darvishmotevalli M , Zarei A , Moradnia M , et al. Optimization of saline wastewater treatment using electrochemical oxidation process: Prediction by RSM method[J]. MethodsX, 2019, 6, 1101- 1113. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.015
17	Ayed L , Bouguerra A , Charef A , et al. Biodegradation of Olive Mill Wastewater by a newly isolated novel bacterial consortium under RSM optimized culture conditions[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019, 32, 100986. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100986

影响因素	编码	水平和范围
影响因素	编码	-1	0	1
吸附液流速/(mL·min^-1)	X₁	1.5	2.0	2.5
溶液pH	X₂	4	5	6
温度/℃	X₃	10	20	30

影响因素	编码	水平和范围
影响因素	编码	-1	0	1
吸附液流速/(mL·min^-1)	X₁	1.5	2.0	2.5
溶液pH	X₂	4	5	6
温度/℃	X₃	10	20	30

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
模型	6.450E+007	9	7.167E+006	355.90	< 0.000 1
A-X₁	2.672E+007	1	2.672E+007	1 326.76	< 0.000 1
B-X₂	1.072E+006	1	1.072E+006	53.21	0.000 2
C-X₃	9.274E+006	1	9.274E+006	460.55	< 0.000 1
AB	3.733E+005	1	3.733E+005	18.54	0.003 5
AC	4.640E+006	1	4.640E+006	230.41	< 0.000 1
BC	2.467E+005	1	2.467E+005	12.25	0.010 0
A²	1.714E+007	1	1.714E+007	850.97	< 0.000 1
B²	1.023E+005	1	1.023E+005	5.08	0.058 8
C²	3.709E+006	1	3.709E+006	184.20	< 0.000 1
残差	1.410E+005	7	20 137.56
失拟	1.410E+005	3	46 985.59	30 712.15	< 0.000 1
纯误差	6.12	4	1.53
总和	6.464E+007

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
模型	6.450E+007	9	7.167E+006	355.90	< 0.000 1
A-X₁	2.672E+007	1	2.672E+007	1 326.76	< 0.000 1
B-X₂	1.072E+006	1	1.072E+006	53.21	0.000 2
C-X₃	9.274E+006	1	9.274E+006	460.55	< 0.000 1
AB	3.733E+005	1	3.733E+005	18.54	0.003 5
AC	4.640E+006	1	4.640E+006	230.41	< 0.000 1
BC	2.467E+005	1	2.467E+005	12.25	0.010 0
A²	1.714E+007	1	1.714E+007	850.97	< 0.000 1
B²	1.023E+005	1	1.023E+005	5.08	0.058 8
C²	3.709E+006	1	3.709E+006	184.20	< 0.000 1
残差	1.410E+005	7	20 137.56
失拟	1.410E+005	3	46 985.59	30 712.15	< 0.000 1
纯误差	6.12	4	1.53
总和	6.464E+007

组数	流速/(mL·min^-1）	pH	温度/℃	还原物质量浓度/(μg·L^-1)		相对误差/%
组数	流速/(mL·min^-1）	pH	温度/℃	实测值	预测值	相对误差/%
1	2.5	6	20	4 589.16	4 677.20	-1.88
2	2.5	8	30	5 453.89	5 307.12	2.77
3	3.0	3	10	13 890.06	14 071.74	-1.29

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export