工业水处理 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 83-87. doi: 10.11894/iwt.2020-0180

• 试验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

厌氧与缺氧/好氧交替式SBR处理印染废水

古航坤1,2(),黄斌1,2,罗赵青1,2,李灿1,2,魏超3,徐锡言4,魏春海1,2,*()   

  1. 1. 广州大学土木工程学院市政工程系, 广东广州 510006
    2. 珠江三角洲水质安全与保护教育部重点实验室, 广东广州 510006
    3. 中山市民东有机废物处理有限公司, 广东中山 528441
    4. 广东新大禹环境科技股份有限公司, 广东广州 510663
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-13 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-27
  • 通讯作者: 魏春海 E-mail:ghk455818213@163.com;weich@gzhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:古航坤(1996-), 硕士在读。电话:18124233672, E-mail:ghk455818213@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广州大学"百人计划"项目(69-18ZX10043);广州大学仪器设备开放共享基金(2018062821)

Anaerobic and anoxic/aerobic alternative SBR treatment for printing and dyeing wastewater

Hangkun Gu1,2(),Bin Huang1,2,Zhaoqing Luo1,2,Can Li1,2,Chao Wei3,Xiyan Xu4,Chunhai Wei1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Municipal Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    2. Key Laboratory for Water Quality and Conservation of the Pearl River Delta, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510006, China
    3. Zhongshan Mindong Organic Waste Materials Disposal Co., Ltd., Zhongshan 528441, China
    4. Guangdong Xindayu Environmental Science and Technology Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510663, China
  • Received:2020-11-13 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-27
  • Contact: Chunhai Wei E-mail:ghk455818213@163.com;weich@gzhu.edu.cn

摘要:

开展了厌氧与缺氧/好氧交替式SBR处理实际印染废水的小试研究。厌氧SBR处理印染废水的COD平均去除率为75%,平均出水COD为237 mg/L。缺氧/好氧交替式SBR采用分段进水和外加碳源的方式处理厌氧SBR出水,两段进水分配比为800 mL:200 mL时,处理效果较佳,仅因反硝化碳源不足导致出水总氮未满足《纺织染整工业水污染物排放标准》(GB 4278-2012)的直接排放标准;外加葡萄糖的实际与理论投加量之比为3时,处理效果最佳,出水平均COD为79 mg/L、氨氮为0.4 mg/L、总氮为13.5 mg/L、总磷为0.14 mg/L,均满足直接排放标准。

关键词: 厌氧SBR, 缺氧/好氧交替式SBR, 印染废水, 脱氮除磷, 分段进水, 外加碳源

Abstract:

Lab-scale anaerobic and anoxic/aerobic alternative SBR was used for real printing and dyeing wastewater treatment. The average COD removal rate and effluent COD of anaerobic SBR treating raw wastewater was 75% and 237 mg/L. Anaerobic SBR effluent was further treated by anoxic/aerobic alternative SBR with the mode of step-wise feeding and external carbon source. When the two-step feeding ratio was 800 mL:200 mL, the treatment performance of anoxic/aerobic alternative SBR was better, where only total nitrogen could not meet the direct discharge standards of water pollutants for dyeing and finishing of textile industry(GB 4278-2012) due to insufficient carbon source for denitrification. When the ratio of real external carbon source(glucose) dosage vs. theoretical dosage for denitrification was 3, the treatment performance of anoxic/aerobic alternative SBR was best, where average effluent COD(79 mg/L), ammonia nitrogen(0.4 mg/L), total nitrogen(13.5 mg/L) and total phosphorus(0.14 mg/L) could meet the direct discharge standards.

Key words: anaerobic SBR, anoxic/aerobic alternative SBR, printing and dyeing wastewater, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, step-wise feeding, external carbon source

中图分类号: