厌氧颗粒活性炭折板工艺处理丁辛醇废水效能研究

doi:10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2022-0191

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

丁辛醇废水（BOW）是一种新型煤化工废水，含有高浓度的难降解有毒有机污染物，对人体健康和生态环境造成危害。萃取法、焚烧法、空气催化氧化法等物化法可用于丁辛醇废水的处理，但成本较高、流程复杂。厌氧消化是丁辛醇废水的绿色、高效处理技术之一，然而传统的厌氧工艺易受有毒污染物、高盐等因素影响。对高盐条件下厌氧颗粒活性炭折板工艺（GAC-ABR）处理丁辛醇废水的启动、盐冲击与恢复过程及其微生物菌群变化进行探索。结果表明，与厌氧折板反应器（ABR）工艺相比，GAC-ABR工艺可提高丁辛醇废水厌氧处理的甲烷产量并缓解酸化现象。在GAC-ABR工艺中，污泥的嗜乙酸产甲烷活性提高了1.94~2.27倍，且污泥的电子传递系统活性提高了13.1%~16.4%。微生物群落结构分析表明，GAC-ABR工艺中富集的电活性互营微生物Syntrophomonas和Methanosarcina是提高丁辛醇废水处理效果的关键；其中，Syntrophomonas表现出良好的耐盐性，而Methanosarcina的耐盐性弱于Methanosphaera和Methanobacteria。

关键词: 厌氧消化, 丁辛醇废水, 煤化工废水, 盐冲击

Abstract:

Butanol octanol wastewater （BOW） is a new type of coal chemical wastewater that contains high concentrations of toxic organic pollutants that are difficult to degrade and pose a risk to human health and the ecological environment. Physical and chemical methods such as extraction， incineration and air-catalytic oxidation can be used for the treatment of butanol octanol wastewater， but the cost is high and the process is complicated. Anaerobic digestion is one of the green and efficient treatment technologies for wastewater， however， the traditional anaerobic process is susceptible to toxic pollutants， high salt and other factors. The start-up， salt shock and recovery processes， changes in microbial community of anaerobic granular activated carbon baffled reactor （GAC-ABR） for butanol octanol wastewater treatment under high salt conditions were explored. The results showed that the GAC-ABR process improved methane production and mitigates acidification in the anaerobic treatment of butanol octanol wastewater compared to ABR. In GAC-ABR， the acetoclastic methanogenic activity of sludge was increased by 1.94-2.27 times and the electron transport system activity of sludge was increased by 13.1%-16.4%. Microbial community structure analysis showed that the electroactive syntrophic microorganisms Syntrophomonas and Methanosarcina enriched in GAC-ABR process were the key to improving the treatment of butanol octanol wastewater. Among them， Syntrophomonas showed better salt tolerance， while Methanosarcina was less tolerant than Methanosphaera and Methanobacteria.

Key words: anaerobic digestion, butanol octanol wastewater, coal chemical wastewater, salt shock

中图分类号:

X703

申凯宇,郑梦启,何春华,胡真虎,汪炎,王伟. 厌氧颗粒活性炭折板工艺处理丁辛醇废水效能研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(12): 114-121.

Kaiyu SHEN,Mengqi ZHENG,Chunhua HE,Zhenhu HU,Yan WANG,Wei WANG. Study on the treatment of butanol octanol wastewater by anaerobic granular activated carbon baffled reactor[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(12): 114-121.

https://www.iwt.cn/CN/Y2022/V42/I12/114

图/表 9

参考文献 33

1	吕后鲁. 丁辛醇生产废水处理技术研究［D］. 苏州：苏州大学，2007.
	Houlu LÜ. Study on treatment technologies of wastewater from butanol and octanol production［D］. Suzhou：Soochow University，2007.
2	张平. 丁辛醇缩合废水处理工艺研究［D］. 天津：天津科技大学，2020.
	ZHANG Ping. Study on treatment technology of butyl alcohol and 2-ethyl hexanol condensation wastewater［D］. Tianjin：Tianjin University of Science & Technology，2020.
3	APPELS L， LAUWERS J， DEGRÈVE J，et al. Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production：Potential and research challenges［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews，2011，15（9）：4295-4301.
4	LIU Tingxia， Hua OU， SU Kuizu，et al. Promoting direct inter species electron transfer and acetoclastic methanogenesis for enhancing anaerobic digestion of butanol octanol wastewater by coupling granular activated carbon and exogenous hydrogen［J］. Bioresource Technology，2021，337：125417.
5	GAHLOT P， AHMED B， TIWARI S B，et al. Conductive material engineered direct inter species electron transfer（DIET） in anaerobic digestion：Mechanism and application［J］. Environmental Technology & Innovation，2020，20：101056.
6	CRUZ VIGGI C， ROSSETTI S， FAZI S，et al. Magnetite particles triggering a faster and more robust syntrophic pathway of methanogenic propionate degradation［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2014，48（13）：7536-7543.
7	LEFEBVRE O， MOLETTA R. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater：A literature review［J］. Water Research，2006，40（20）：3671-3682.
8	DE VRIEZE J， CHRISTIAENS M E R， WALRAEDT D，et al. Microbial community redundancy in anaerobic digestion drives process recovery after salinity exposure［J］. Water Research，2017，111：109-117.
9	CHEN Qian， LIU Chuanqi， LIU Xinying，et al. Magnetite enhances anaerobic digestion of high salinity organic wastewater［J］. Environmental Research，2020，189：109884.
10	WANG Wei， WU Benteng， PAN Shanglei，et al. Performance robustness of the UASB reactors treating saline phenolic wastewater and analysis of microbial community structure［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials，2017，331：21-27.
11	ZHANG Zhaohan， GAO Peng， CHENG Jiaqi，et al. Enhancing anaerobic digestion and methane production of tetracycline wastewater in EGSB reactor with GAC/NZVI mediator［J］. Water Research，2018，136：54-63.
12	YIN Qidong， YANG Shuo， WANG Zhongzhong，et al. Clarifying electron transfer and metagenomic analysis of microbial community in the methane production process with the addition of ferroferric oxide［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal，2018，333：216-225.
13	国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法［M］. 4版. 北京：中国环境科学出版社，2002：497-516.
14	XING W， NGO H H， KIM S H，et al. Adsorption and bioadsorption of granular activated carbon （GAC） for dissolved organic carbon （DOC） removal in wastewater［J］. Bioresource Technology，2008，99（18）：8674-8678.
15	ZHANG Yingdi， ZHANG Lei， GUO Bing，et al. Granular activated carbon stimulated microbial physiological changes for enhanced anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal，2020，400：125838.
16	GAGLIANO M C， ISMAIL S B， STAMS A J M，et al. Biofilm formation and granule properties in anaerobic digestion at high salinity［J］. Water Research，2017，121：61-71.
17	CHOWDHURY B， LIN Long， DHAR B R，et al. Enhanced biomethane recovery from fat，oil，and grease through co-digestion with food waste and addition of conductive materials［J］. Chemosphere，2019，236：124362.
18	YAN Wangwang， SUN Faqian， LIU Jianbo，et al. Enhanced anaerobic phenol degradation by conductive materials via EPS and microbial community alteration［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal，2018，352：1-9.
19	KONG Xin， YU Shuyao， FANG Wen，et al. Enhancing syntrophic associations among Clostridium butyricum，Syntrophomonas and two types of methanogen by zero valent iron in an anaerobic assay with a high organic loading［J］. Bioresource Technology，2018，257：181-191.
20	LI Huijuan， CHANG Jiali， LIU Pengfei，et al. Direct inter species electron transfer accelerates syntrophic oxidation of butyrate in paddy soil enrichments［J］. Environmental Microbiology，2015，17（5）：1533-1547.
21	ZHANG Wei， DAI Kun， XIA Xiuyang，et al. Free acetic acid as the key factor for the inhibition of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in mesophilic mixed culture fermentation［J］. Bioresource Technology，2018，264：17-23.
22	TAN R， MIYANAGA K， TOYAMA K，et al. Changes in composition and microbial communities in excess sludge after heat-alkaline treatment and acclimation［J］. Biochemical Engineering Journal，2010，52（2/3）：151-159.
23	JI Yang， LIU Pengfei， CONRAD R. Response of fermenting bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities in paddy soil to progressing rice straw degradation［J］. Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2018，124：70-80.
24	LEE S H， PARK J H， KIM S H，et al. Evidence of syntrophic acetate oxidation by spirochaetes during anaerobic methane production［J］. Bioresource Technology，2015，190：543-549.
25	WANG Weikuang， NI Chenhua， GUO Yuejie，et al. Long-term performance and metagenomic analysis of full-scale anaerobic granular sludge bioreactors for low aerobically-biodegradable synthetic fiber manufacturing wastewater treatment［J］. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation，2020，153：105046.
26	XIAO Youqian， YANG Hongnan， ZHENG Dan，et al. Granular activated carbon alleviates the combined stress of ammonia and adverse temperature conditions during dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure［J］. Renewable Energy，2021，169：451-460.
27	KURIBAYASHI K， KOBAYASHI Y， YOKOYAMA K，et al. Digested sludge-degrading and hydrogen-producing bacterial floras and their potential for biohydrogen production［J］. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation，2017，120：58-65.
28	OYEWUSI H A， ABDUL WAHAB R， EDBEIB M F，et al. Functional profiling of bacterial communities in Lake Tuz using 16S rRNA gene sequences［J］. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment，2021，35（1）：1-10.
29	WANG Huizhong， LV Xiaomeng， YI Yue，et al. Using DNA-based stable isotope probing to reveal novel propionate-and acetate-oxidizing bacteria in propionate-fed mesophilic anaerobic chemostats［J］. Scientific Reports，2019，9：17396.
30	WU Shulin， SUN Jing， CHEN Xueming，et al. Unveiling the mechanisms of medium-chain fatty acid production from waste activated sludge alkaline fermentation liquor through physiological，thermodynamic and metagenomic investigations［J］. Water Research，2020，169：115218.
31	DU Jin， YIN Qidong， GU Mengqi，et al. New insights into the effect of ethanol and volatile fatty acids proportions on methanogenic activities and pathways［J］. Environmental Research，2021，194：110644.
32	JEDDI M， KARRAY F， LOUKIL S，et al. Anaerobic biological treatment of industrial saline wastewater：Fixed bed reactor performance and analysis of the microbial community structure and abundance［J］. Environmental Technology，2020，41（13）：1715-1725.
33	HU Yangqing， WANG Fei， CHI Yong.The evolution of microbial community during acclimation for high sodium food waste anaerobic digestion［J］.Waste and Biomass Valorization，2020，11（11）：6057-6063. doi:10.1007/s12649-019-00851-2 doi: 10.1007/s12649-019-00851-2 URL

序号	保留时间/min	名称	相对峰面积/%
1	10.69	3-庚酮	7.83
2	10.95	3-庚醇	10.52
3	12.38	3，5-二甲基-3-己醇	0.84
4	15.26	2-乙基-1-己醇（辛醇）	71.27
5	17.47	2，4-二甲基-3-戊醇	2.89
6	17.56	2-甲基-3-庚酮	6.65

序号	保留时间/min	名称	相对峰面积/%
1	10.69	3-庚酮	7.83
2	10.95	3-庚醇	10.52
3	12.38	3，5-二甲基-3-己醇	0.84
4	15.26	2-乙基-1-己醇（辛醇）	71.27
5	17.47	2，4-二甲基-3-戊醇	2.89
6	17.56	2-甲基-3-庚酮	6.65

阶段		反应器	COD/ （mg·L^-1）	NaCl质量浓度/（g·L^-1）	甲烷产量/ （mL·d^-1）	COD去除率/%	甲烷转化率/%
S1	第1天—第10天	R1	2 000	0	1 782.4±150.6	95.9±1.3	84.8±4.8
	第1天—第10天	R0	2 000	0	—	75.4±3.8	—
	第11天—第36天	R1	2 000	0	1 907.6±171.9	93.1±1.0	86.3±3.3
	第11天—第36天	R0	2 000	0	—	90.5±1.5	—
	第37天—第68天	R1	4 000	0	4 527.6±314.6	91.9±1.0	91.2±3.2
	第37天—第68天	R0	4 000	0	4 177.5±358.8	91.1±1.2	84.7±3.8
S2	第69天—第82天	R1	4 000	10	4185.8±329.8	88.5±1.8	85.4±3.8
	第69天—第82天	R0	4 000	10	4 051.2±373.1	87.9±1.8	83.0±2.9
	第83天—第92天	R1	4 000	20	—	—	70.1±3.9
	第83天—第92天	R0	4 000	20	—	—	74.1±3.2
S3	第93天—第116天	R1	4 000	0	2 765.3±398.5	67.5±6.9	82.3±2.6
S3	第93天—第116天	R0	4 000	0	1 355.8±203.4	49.8±5.8	54.7±4.6

阶段		反应器	COD/ （mg·L^-1）	NaCl质量浓度/（g·L^-1）	甲烷产量/ （mL·d^-1）	COD去除率/%	甲烷转化率/%
S1	第1天—第10天	R1	2 000	0	1 782.4±150.6	95.9±1.3	84.8±4.8
	第1天—第10天	R0	2 000	0	—	75.4±3.8	—
	第11天—第36天	R1	2 000	0	1 907.6±171.9	93.1±1.0	86.3±3.3
	第11天—第36天	R0	2 000	0	—	90.5±1.5	—
	第37天—第68天	R1	4 000	0	4 527.6±314.6	91.9±1.0	91.2±3.2
	第37天—第68天	R0	4 000	0	4 177.5±358.8	91.1±1.2	84.7±3.8
S2	第69天—第82天	R1	4 000	10	4185.8±329.8	88.5±1.8	85.4±3.8
	第69天—第82天	R0	4 000	10	4 051.2±373.1	87.9±1.8	83.0±2.9
	第83天—第92天	R1	4 000	20	—	—	70.1±3.9
	第83天—第92天	R0	4 000	20	—	—	74.1±3.2
S3	第93天—第116天	R1	4 000	0	2 765.3±398.5	67.5±6.9	82.3±2.6
S3	第93天—第116天	R0	4 000	0	1 355.8±203.4	49.8±5.8	54.7±4.6

样本	细菌			古菌
样本	Shannon	Chao 1	覆盖度	Shannon	Chao 1	覆盖度
R1S1	3.60	450.53	0.99	1.89	35.50	0.99
R0S1	3.84	445.11	0.99	2.11	45.00	0.99
R1S2	3.78	637.02	0.99	1.82	23.00	0.99
R0S2	4.32	593.25	0.99	2.02	22.00	0.99
R1S3	3.68	486.52	0.99	1.75	15.00	0.99
R0S3	4.02	449.34	0.99	1.59	15.00	0.99

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容