群体猝灭技术在控制MBR生物污染中的研究进展

doi:10.11894/iwt.2020-0439

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

膜生物反应器（MBR）广泛用于处理市政污水，但膜污染仍是MBR的应用瓶颈。基于微生物群体感应（QS）理论的群体猝灭（QQ）技术是一种具有较好前景的膜污染控制方法。QQ技术可干扰微生物的QS系统，进而抑制胞外聚合物的分泌和生物膜的形成，从根本上达到控制MBR生物污染的目的。对利用QQ技术控制MBR生物污染的研究进展进行总结，提出该技术面临的挑战，并对今后采用QQ技术减缓膜污染的研究进行展望。

关键词: 群体感应, 群体猝灭, 生物污染, 膜生物反应器

Abstract:

Membrane bioreactor(MBR) has been widely applied for municipal wastewater treatment, but membrane fouling is still the bottleneck problem. Quorum quenching(QQ) technology based on microbial quorum sensing is a promising method for membrane fouling control. QQ technology interferes with the QS system of microorganisms, and then inhibits the secretion of extracellular polymers and the formation of biofilm, which fundamentally control the MBR biofouling. The new progresses of QQ technology for MBR biofouling control were reviewed. The confronting challenges for this technology was proposed, and the future directions were put forward.

Key words: quorum sensing, quorum quenching, biofouling, membrane bioreactor

中图分类号:

X703

张泽瀚,洪乾坤,刘博超,王侃鸣,王红宇. 群体猝灭技术在控制MBR生物污染中的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2021, 41(4): 7-13.

Zehan Zhang,Qiankun Hong,Bochao Liu,Kanming Wang,Hongyu Wang. Research progress on quorum quenching technology in controlling MBR biofouling[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2021, 41(4): 7-13.

https://www.iwt.cn/CN/Y2021/V41/I4/7

图/表 2

参考文献 40

1	朱兆亮, 崔山, 葛孝新, 等. 预氧化-MBR-反渗透工艺深度处理印染废水研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2017, 37 (5): 79- 82. URL
2	郝晓地, 陈峤, 李季, 等. MBR工艺全球应用现状及趋势分析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018, 34 (20): 7- 12. URL
3	唐朝春, 段先月, 叶鑫, 等. MBR膜污染的机理及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2017, 37 (4): 18- 21. URL
4	Lin Hongjun , Zhang Meijia , Wang Fangyuan , et al. A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances(EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 460, 110- 125. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.034
5	Oh H S , Lee C H . Origin and evolution of quorum quenching technology for biofouling control in MBRs for wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 554, 331- 345. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.019
6	Lee K , Yu Huarong , Zhang Xiaolei , et al. Quorum sensing and quenching in membrane bioreactors: opportunities and challenges for biofouling control[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 270, 656- 668. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.019
7	Kose-Mutlu B , Ergon-Can T , Koyuncu I , et al. Quorum quenching for effective control of biofouling in membrane bioreactor: a comprehensive review of approaches, applications, and challenges[J]. Environmental Engineering Research, 2019, 24 (4): 543- 558. doi: 10.4491/eer.2018.380
8	Davies D G , Parsek M R , Pearson J P , et al. The involvement of cellto-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm[J]. Science, 1998, 280, 295- 298. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5361.295
9	Paluch E , Rewaksoroczynska J , Jedrusik I , et al. Prevention of biofilm formation by quorum quenching[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, 104 (5): 1871- 1881. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10349-w
10	Eberhard A , Burlingame A L , Eberhard C , et al. Structural identification of autoinducer of photobacterium fischeri luciferase[J]. Biochemistry, 1981, 20 (9): 2444- 2449. doi: 10.1021/bi00512a013
11	Mcnab R , Ford S K , El-Sabaeny A , et al. LuxS-based signaling in streptococcus gordonii: autoinducer 2 controls carbohydrate metabolism and biofilm formation with porphyromonas gingivalis[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 2003, 185 (1): 274- 284. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.1.274-284.2003
12	Logan B E , Rabaey K . Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies[J]. Science, 2012, 337 (6095): 686- 690. doi: 10.1126/science.1217412
13	Whiteley M , Diggle S P , Greenberg E P , et al. Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research[J]. Nature, 2017, 551 (7680): 313- 320. doi: 10.1038/nature24624
14	Yeon K M , Lee C H , Kim J . Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43 (19): 7403- 7409. URL
15	Jiang Wei , Xia Siqing , Liang Jun . Effect of quorum quenching on the reactor performance, biofouling and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47, 187- 196. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.050
16	Oh H S , Yeon K M , Yang C S , et al. Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46 (9): 4877- 4884. URL
17	Lee K , Lee S , Lee S H , et al. Fungal quorum quenching: a paradigm shift for energy savings in membrane bioreactor(MBR) for wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50, 10914- 10922. URL
18	Dong Yihu , Zhang Lianhui . Quorum sensing and quorum-quenching enzymes[J]. Journal of Microbiology, 2005, 43, 101- 109. URL
19	Yeon K M , Cheong W S , Oh H S , et al. Quorum sensing: a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43 (2): 380- 385. URL
20	Kim J H , Choi D C , Yeon K M , et al. Enzyme-immobilized nanofiltration membrane to mitigate biofouling based on quorum quenching[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45 (4): 1601- 1607. URL
21	Cheong W S , Lee C H , Moon Y H , et al. Isolation and identification of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, for biofouling control in MBR[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52, 10554- 10560. URL
22	Ham S Y , Kim H S , Cha E , et al. Mitigation of membrane biofouling by a quorum quenching bacterium for membrane bioreactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 258, 220- 226. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.007
23	Lee K , Kim Y W , Lee S , et al. Stopping autoinduce-2 chatter by means of an indigenous bacterium(Acinetobacter sp. DKY-1): a new antibiofouling strategy in a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52, 6237- 6245. URL
24	Jahangir D , Oh H S , Kim S R , et al. Specific location of encapsulated quorum quenching bacteria for biofouling control in an external submerged membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 411, 130- 136. URL
25	Kim S R , Oh H S , Jo S J . Biofouling control with bead-entrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors: physical and biological effects[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47 (2): 836- 842. URL
26	Lee S H , Lee S , Lee K , et al. More efficient media design for enhanced biofouling control in a membrane bioreactor: quorum quenching bacteria entrapping hollow cylinder[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50 (16): 8596- 8604. URL
27	Lee S , Lee S H , Lee K , et al. Effect of the shape and size of quorum quenching media on biofouling control in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 26 (10): 1746- 1754. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1605.05021
28	Nahm C H , Choi D C , Kwon H , et al. Application of quorum quenching bacteria entrapping sheets to enhance biofouling control in a membrane bioreactor with a hollow fiber module[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 526, 264- 271. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.046
29	Ergon-Can T , Kose-Mutlu B , Koyuncu I I , et al. Biofouling control based on bacterial quorum quenching with a new application: rotary microbial carrier frame[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 525, 116- 124. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.036
30	Cheong W S , Kim S R , Oh H S , et al. Design of quorum quenching microbial vessel to enhance cell viability for biofouling control in MBR[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 24 (1): 97- 105.
31	Maqbool T , Khan S J , Waheed H , et al. Membrane biofouling retardation and improved sludge characteristics using quorum quenching bacteria in submerged membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 483, 75- 83. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.011
32	Lee S , Park S K , Kwon H , et al. Crossing the border between laboratory and field: bacterial quorum quenching for anti-biofouling strategy in an MBR[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50, 1788- 1795. URL
33	Li Yusheng , Cao Jiashun , Li Bingbing , et al. Outcompeting presence of acyl-homoserine-lactone(AHL)-quenching bacteria over AHL-producing bacteria in aerobic granules[J]. Environmental Science and Technology Letters, 2016, 3 (1): 36- 40. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00332
34	Yu Huarong , Liang Heng , Qu Fangshu , et al. Biofouling control by biostimulation of quorum-quenching bacteria in a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2016, 113, 2624- 2632. doi: 10.1002/bit.26039
35	Yu Huarong , Lee K , Zhang Xiaolei , et al. Core-shell structured quorum quenching beads for more sustainable anti-biofouling in membrane bioreactors[J]. Water Research, 2019, 150, 321- 329. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.071
36	Yu Wenzheng , Campos L C , Graham N . Application of pulsed UV-irradiation and precoagulation to control ultrafiltration membrane fouling in the treatment of micro-polluted surface water[J]. Water Research, 2016, 107, 83- 92. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.058
37	Zhang Xiaolei , Lee K , Yu Huarong , et al. Photolytic quorum quenching: a new anti-biofouling strategy for membrane bioreactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 278, 12235. URL
38	Feng Xiaochi , Guo Wangqing , Zheng Heshan , et al. Inhibition of biofouling in membrane bioreactor by metabolic uncoupler based on controlling microorganisms accumulation and quorum sensing signals secretion[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 245, 125- 363. URL
39	Liu Jianbo , Eng C Y , Ho J S , et al. Quorum quenching in anaerobic membrane bioreactor for fouling control[J]. Water Research, 2019, 156, 159- 167. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.029
40	Xu Boyan , Ng T C , Huang Shujun , et al. Feasibility of isolated novel facultative quorum quenching consortiums for fouling control in an AnMBR[J]. Water Research, 2020, 169, 115251. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115251

[1]	李莹, 刘强, 项玮, 曲吉祥, 杨翠萍, 范秀磊. MBR与HMBR除污效能及相关功能微生物对比研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(7): 156-161.
[2]	史金卓, 胡以松, 肖文倩, 李松华, 杨媛, 田文瑞. 电化学-膜生物反应器强化污废水处理的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(5): 32-41.
[3]	潘伟亮, 谭秀晴, 欧阳荭霖, 颜山脊. 生物炭强化厌氧膜生物反应器处理废水性能的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(4): 38-45.
[4]	刘军, 陈勇强, 刘主根, 任新华, 吕志新, 于海超, 明红霞. 海水淡化反渗透膜生物污堵防控及早期监测防控研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(12): 12-19.
[5]	朱海东, 朱卫兵. 邯郸某垃圾填埋场渗滤液处理站扩容改造工程实例[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(12): 192-198.
[6]	司马聪, 张新波, 程衍斌, 王慧中, 杜青, 钟玲玲, NGO Huu Hao. DcMFC-AnMBR耦合系统处理含磺胺嘧啶养猪废水的性能研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(10): 68-75.
[7]	黄生林, 吴健, 陈卫华, 乐亮亮, 苏醒, 胡念, 陈小光. 餐厨垃圾沼液的超滤膜错流过滤数学模型[J]. 工业水处理, 2023, 43(9): 138-143.
[8]	运红颖, 孟皓, 邢芳华, 汪涛. 新型膜组件MBR启动运行Anammox工艺及膜污染控制[J]. 工业水处理, 2023, 43(1): 124-130.
[9]	张浩良, 刘聪, 洪乾坤, 王侃鸣, 王红宇. MBR中膜污染的人工神经网络预测研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(7): 15-23.
[10]	陈妹, 杨阳, 王鑫. MEC耦合AnMBR技术在污水处理中的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(6): 1-9.
[11]	徐斌, 徐冰洁. O-AO-MBR组合工艺处理煤化工综合废水[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(6): 187-192.
[12]	洪颖忻, 吴浪, 张立秋, 方茜, 荣宏伟, 魏春海. 制药废水处理系统中抗生素抗性基因的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(4): 39-45.
[13]	纪振, 邱立伟, 尹业新. 物化-生化工艺处理窗饰喷涂废水工程实例[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(2): 173-176.
[14]	李莹, 刘强, 项玮, 李倩囡. 基于群体感应相关菌群分析的HMBR膜污染控制研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(11): 122-126.
[15]	任志鹏, 陈小光. 无泡式中空纤维膜生物反应器研究与应用现状[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(1): 38-47.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容