DcMFC-AnMBR耦合系统处理含磺胺嘧啶养猪废水的性能研究

doi:10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2023-1200

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构建了双室微生物燃料电池-厌氧膜生物反应器（DcMFC-AnMBR）耦合工艺系统，探究了耦合系统处理含磺胺嘧啶（SDZ）养猪废水的产电、污染物去除及产气性能，同时分析了SDZ影响下膜污染特征变化。结果表明：1.0 mg/L SDZ存在下DcMFC-AnMBR耦合系统平均输出电压和库仑效率分别下降了6.11%和7%，耦合系统最大功率密度为35.34 mW/m²，COD去除率始终保持在98%，平均生物气产量为542.59 mL/d。同时，SDZ的存在使污泥混合液Zeta电位绝对值升高了25.83%，污泥平均粒径减小了14~16 µm，可溶性微生物产物（SMP）和胞外聚合物（EPS）平均浓度分别上升了7.76%和35.43%。耦合工艺系统运行期间跨膜压差（TMP）始终在0附近，其污染缓解原因可能是电活性微生物对SMP和EPS进行了有效的氧化降解。

关键词: 双室微生物燃料电池, 厌氧膜生物反应器, 养猪废水, 磺胺嘧啶, 膜污染

Abstract:

A dual-chamber microbial fuel cell-anaerobic membrane bioreactor(DcMFC-AnMBR) coupled process system was constructed. The power production, pollutant removal, and gas generation performance of the coupled system for treating swine wastewater containing sulfadiazine(SDZ) was investigated, and the change of membrane pollution characteristics under the influence of SDZ was also analyzed. The results showed that in the presence of 1.0 mg/L SDZ, the average output voltage and coulombic efficiency of the DcMFC-AnMBR coupled system decreased by 6.11% and 7%, respectively. The maximum power density of the coupled system was 35.34 mW/m², the COD removal rate remained at 98%, and the average biogas production was 542.59 mL/d. Meanwhile, the presence of SDZ increased the absolute value of Zeta potential of sludge mixture by 25.83%, the average particle size of sludge decreased by 14-16 µm, and the average concentrations of soluble microbial products(SMP) and extracellular polymers(EPS) increased by 7.76% and 35.43%, respectively. The transmembrane pressure(TMP) was consistently near zero during the operation of the coupled process system. The cause of membrane fouling mitigation in coupled systems could be attributed to the oxidative degradation of SMP and EPS by electroactive microorganisms.

Key words: dual-chamber microbial fuel cell, anaerobic membrane bioreactor, swine wastewater, sulfadiazine, membrane fouling

中图分类号:

司马聪, 张新波, 程衍斌, 王慧中, 杜青, 钟玲玲, NGO Huu Hao. DcMFC-AnMBR耦合系统处理含磺胺嘧啶养猪废水的性能研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(10): 68-75.

Cong SIMA, Xinbo ZHANG, Yanbin CHENG, Huizhong WANG, Qing DU, Lingling ZHONG, Huu Hao NGO. Performance of DcMFC-AnMBR coupled system for the treatment of sulfadiazine-containing swine wastewater[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2024, 44(10): 68-75.

https://www.iwt.cn/CN/Y2024/V44/I10/68

图/表 7

图1 DcMFC-AnMBR系统示意

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of DcMFC-AnMBR system

图2 DcMFC-AnMBR运行期间输出电压和库仑效率随时间的变化

Fig.2 Changes of output voltage and coulombic efficiency with time during DcMFC-AnMBR operation

图3 DcMFC-AnMBR的极化曲线、功率密度曲线（a）和CV曲线（b）

Fig.3 Polarization and power density curves（a），and CV curves（b） of DcMFC-AnMBR

图4 COD去除率和生物气产量随时间的变化

Fig.4 Changes of COD removal rate and biogas production with time

图5 混合液污泥浓度及MLVSS/MLSS

Fig.5 Sludge concentration and MLVSS/MLSS of mixed liquid

图6 DcMFC-AnMBR耦合系统内活性污泥的粒径分布

Fig.6 Particle size distribution of activated sludge in DcMFC-AnMBR coupled system

图7 DcMFC-AnMBR耦合系统SMP含量（a）、EPS含量及SDZ去除率（b）变化情况注：SMP_P表示SMP中的蛋白质；SMP_C表示SMP中的多糖；EPS_P表示EPS中的蛋白质；EPS_C表示EPS中的多糖。

Fig.7 SMP（a），EPS content and SDZ removal rate（b）changes in the DcMFC-AnMBR coupled system

参考文献 31

1	CHENG Dongle， NGO H H， GUO Wenshan，et al. A critical review on antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater：Water pollution problems and control approaches［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials，2020，387：121682. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121682
2	ZHI Suli， ZHOU Jing， LIU Haixue，et al. Simultaneous extraction and determination of 45 veterinary antibiotics in swine manure by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry［J］. Journal of Chromatography B，2020，1154：122286. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122286
3	CHEN Jianfei， XIE Shuguang. Overview of sulfonamide biodegradation and the relevant pathways and microorganisms［J］. The Science of the Total Environment，2018，640/641：1465-1477. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.016
4	徐圣君，王华彩，姜参参，等. 畜禽养殖废水生物处理技术研究进展［J］. 环境科学与技术，2021，44（S2）：153-162.
	XU Shengjun， WANG Huacai， JIANG Cencen，et al. Research progress on biological treatment technology of livestock and poultry breeding wastewater［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2021，44（S2）：153-162.
5	JI Junyuan， XING Yajuan， MA Zitao，et al. Acute toxicity of pharmaceutical wastewaters containing antibiotics to anaerobic digestion treatment［J］. Chemosphere，2013，91（8）：1094-1098. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.009
6	TANG Jialing， PU Yunhui， ZENG Ting，et al. Enhanced methane production coupled with livestock wastewater treatment using anaerobic membrane bioreactor：Performance and membrane filtration properties［J］. Bioresource Technology，2022，345：126470. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126470
7	DE VELA R J. A review of the factors affecting the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and strategies to control membrane fouling［J］. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio-Technology，2021，20（3）：607-644.
8	刘壮壮，李同，刘崇涛，等. 微生物燃料电池处理畜禽养殖废水研究进展及展望［J］. 农业资源与环境学报，2024，41（2）：344-359.
	LIU Zhuangzhuang， LI Tong， LIU Chongtao，et al. Progress and prospects of microbial fuel cells for treating livestock and poultry wastewater［J］. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment，2024，41（2）：344-359.
9	CAO Mengjing， ZHANG Yongxiang， ZHANG Yan. Effect of applied voltage on membrane fouling in the amplifying anaerobic electro-chemical membrane bioreactor for long-term operation［J］. RSC Advances，2021，11（50）：31364-31372.
10	DING Aqiang， FAN Qin， CHENG Ran，et al. Impacts of applied voltage on microbial electrolysis cell-anaerobic membrane bioreactor（MEC-AnMBR） and its membrane fouling mitigation mechanism［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal，2018，333：630-635. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.190
11	ZHANG Shuo， YANG Kai， LIU Wei，et al. Understanding the mechanism of membrane fouling suppression in electro-anaerobic membrane bioreactor［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal，2021，418：129384. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.129384
12	LIU Yanqing， GAO Xintong， CAO Xian，et al. Study on the performance and mechanism of bio-electrochemical system to mitigate membrane fouling in bioreactors［J］. Bioresource Technology，2022，365：128163. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128163
13	YIN Xiafei， LI Xiufen， HUA Zhaozhe，et al. The growth process of the cake layer and membrane fouling alleviation mechanism in a MBR assisted with the self-generated electric field［J］. Water Research，2020，171：115452. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.115452
14	HUANG Haiming， XIAO Dean， LIU Jiahui，et al. Recovery and removal of nutrients from swine wastewater by using a novel integrated reactor for struvite decomposition and recycling［J］. Scientific Reports，2015，5：10183. doi:10.1038/srep10183
15	WAN Yiping， LIU Zehua， LIU Yu. Veterinary antibiotics in swine and cattle wastewaters of China and the United States：Features and differences［J］. Water Environment Research，2021，93（9）：1516-1529. doi:10.1002/wer.1534
16	ZHANG Xinbo， HUANG Haojie， DU Qing，et al. Performance of a recirculated biogas-sparging anaerobic membrane bioreactor system for treating synthetic swine wastewater containing sulfadiazine antibiotic［J］. Chemical Engineering Journal，2023，476：146735. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.146735
17	WU Dongzhu， ZHAO Lin， VAKHARIA V K，et al. Synthesis and characterization of nanoporous polyethersulfone membrane as support for composite membrane in CO₂ separation：From lab to pilot scale［J］. Journal of Membrane Science，2016，510：58-71. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.022
18	李婕，刘广立，张仁铎，等. 葡萄糖和硝基苯为混合燃料时MFC的产电特性研究［J］. 环境科学，2010，31（11）：2811-2817.
	LI Jie， LIU Guangli， ZHANG Renduo，et al. Power generation from glucose and nitrobenzene degradation using the microbial fuel cell［J］. Environmental Science，2010，31（11）：2811-2817.
19	LOGAN B E， HAMELERS B， ROZENDAL R，et al. Microbial fuel cells：Methodology and technology［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2006，40（17）：5181-5192. doi:10.1021/es0605016
20	RAYCHAUDHURI A， BEHERA M. Ceramic membrane modified with rice husk ash for application in microbial fuel cells［J］. Electrochimica Acta，2020，363：137261. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137261
21	赵智强. 厌氧甲烷化中互养微生物种间直接电子传递的构建与强化［D］. 大连：大连理工大学，2017.
	ZHAO Zhiqiang. Establishment and enhancement of direct interspecies electron transfer between syntrophic microorganisms during anaerobic methanogenesis［D］. Dalian：Dalian University of Technology，2017.
22	李欣航. 磺胺嘧啶的厌氧生物降解及其强化［D］. 天津：天津工业大学，2021.
	LI Xinhang. Anaerobic biodegradation of sulfadiazine and its strengthening［D］. Tianjin：Tianjin Polytechnic University，2021.
23	SRIDANG P C， LOBOS J， POTTIER A，et al. Biomass adaptation to complex substrate degradation in membrane bioreactors：Appropriated operating conditions［J］. Water Science and Technology，2008，57（1）：33-40. doi:10.2166/wst.2008.650
24	GIL G C， CHANG I S， KIM B H，et al. Operational parameters affecting the performannce of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell［J］. Biosensors & Bioelectronics，2003，18（4）：327-334. doi:10.1016/s0956-5663(02)00110-0
25	王凤雪，张新波，尚禹彤，等. MBBR-MBR对磺胺嘧啶的去除及膜污染特性［J］. 中国给水排水，2023，39（1）：80-85.
	WANG Fengxue， ZHANG Xinbo， SHANG Yutong，et al. MBBR-MBR system for removal of sulfadiazine and its membrane fouling characteristics［J］. China Water & Wastewater，2023，39（1）：80-85.
26	ZHANG Wenxiang， LIANG Wenzhong， ZHANG Zhien，et al. Aerobic granular sludge（AGS） scouring to mitigate membrane fouling：Performance，hydrodynamic mechanism and contribution quantification model［J］. Water Research，2021，188：116518. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116518
27	LIU Xiaomeng， SHENG Guoping， YU Hanqing. DLVO approach to the flocculability of a photosynthetic H₂-producing bacterium，Rhodopseudomonas acidophila［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2007，41（13）：4620-4625. doi:10.1021/es070107n
28	DEB A， GURUNG K， RUMKY J，et al. Dynamics of microbial community and their effects on membrane fouling in an anoxic-oxic gravity-driven membrane bioreactor under varying solid retention time：A pilot-scale study［J］. Science of the Total Environment，2022，807（Pt 2）：150878. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150878
29	ZHANG Xinbo， ZHANG Zumin， LIU Ying，et al. Impacts of sulfadiazine on the performance and membrane fouling of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system at different C/N ratios［J］. Bioresource Technology，2020，318：124180. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124180
30	JIANG Junqiu， ZHAO Qingliang， WEI Liangliang，et al. Extracellular biological organic matters in microbial fuel cell using sewage sludge as fuel［J］. Water Research，2010，44（7）：2163-2170. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.033
31	ISHIZAKI S， TERADA K， MIYAKE H，et al. Impact of anodic respiration on biopolymer production and consequent membrane fouling［J］. Environmental Science & Technology，2016，50（17）：9515-9523. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00728

[1]	李冰, 吴迪, 石岩, 李海翔, 李甫, 马毅. 膜耦合技术对沼液浓缩及净水效果的影响[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(5): 156-163.
[2]	史金卓, 胡以松, 肖文倩, 李松华, 杨媛, 田文瑞. 电化学-膜生物反应器强化污废水处理的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(5): 32-41.
[3]	任芝军, 白莹, 王秋稳, 韩金龙, 刘晓阳. 膜污染的光学监测技术研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(4): 10-18.
[4]	张棱威, 宁荣盛, 袁江, 于水利. 导电膜膜蒸馏研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(4): 30-37.
[5]	潘伟亮, 谭秀晴, 欧阳荭霖, 颜山脊. 生物炭强化厌氧膜生物反应器处理废水性能的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(4): 38-45.
[6]	尹萌萌, 王禹翰, 张坤, 王冠, 徐维国, 王波. 基于两性离子的纳滤膜抗污染改性方法研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(3): 37-44.
[7]	李棒, 田腾飞, 吴俊峰, 朱新锋, 韩昌睿, 崔璐雪, 张霞, 贠延滨. 膜蒸馏处理脱硫废水过程中污染物组成、分布及形成机理[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(2): 139-146.
[8]	同凡珂, 关通, 周双喜, 王维. 磁性多孔氧化石墨烯的制备及其对典型磺胺类药物的吸附去除[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(12): 109-117.
[9]	戚滢滢, 苏洋舟, 程晓英, 刘强, 张晓磊. 双膜法处理化工废水过程中反渗透膜污染研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(11): 142-147.
[10]	袁旭冬, 杨宇航, 王晓媛, 徐邓琛, 刘顺通, 戴捷. 磁BAF工艺深度处理养猪废水生化尾水[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(10): 52-59.
[11]	田茂芝, 丁梓尧, 孙晨, 周玮钰, 王圣智, 万瀚宇, 李昆. 养殖废水中Fe³⁺累积对藻菌共生体EPS分泌及膜污染特征的影响[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(10): 60-67.
[12]	王国辉, 闫家国, 李艳丽, 王鑫, 陈妹. 光催化耦合膜分离系统中缓解膜污染的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(10): 82-91.
[13]	张瑞君, 安张鑫, 宗悦, 高珊珊, 田家宇. 中空纤维纳滤膜在染料分离应用中的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2024, 44(1): 1-12.
[14]	黄生林, 吴健, 陈卫华, 乐亮亮, 苏醒, 胡念, 陈小光. 餐厨垃圾沼液的超滤膜错流过滤数学模型[J]. 工业水处理, 2023, 43(9): 138-143.
[15]	方艺民, 齐鸣, 学贤, 邵兰燕, 王少东. 膜组合工艺处理含铁填埋场渗滤液及膜污染分析[J]. 工业水处理, 2023, 43(7): 177-184.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容