Research progress in the microbial community and its functional characteristics in activated sludge systems

doi:10.11894/1005-829x.2015.35(3).005

Abstract

Abstract:

Activated sludge is the major part of the removal of ammonium, nitrogen, phosphorus and the mass transition of organic pollutants in wastewater treatment systems. The scale of biological activity fundamentally determines the treatment capacity of wastewater treatment systems. Recognizing the structure and functional characteristics of microbial communities in the activated sludge system has practical and leading meaning for the improvement and optimization of wastewater treatment process. The flora structures of procaryotic cell microbe and protozoan in activated sludge systems, as well as their functional characteristics are summarized, including the removal effect on nitrogen, phosphorus and other specific pollutants of procaryotic cell microbe and the indicative function of protozoan.

Key words: activated sludge, procaryotic cell microbe, protozoan, functional characteristics

摘要：

活性污泥是污水处理系统中脱氮、除磷以及有机污染物质转化的主体,其生物活性的高低从根本上决定了污水处理系统的处理能力。认识活性污泥系统中微生物菌群的结构和功能特性对于污水处理工艺性能的改良和优化有现实指导意义。综述了活性污泥系统中原核细胞型微生物和原生动物的群落结构,以及两者各自的功能特性,包括原核细胞型微生物对氮、磷和其他特定污染物的去除作用,原生动物的指示作用。

关键词: 活性污泥, 原核细胞型微生物, 原生动物, 功能特性

CLC Number:

X703.1

Zhang Zi, Tang Bing. Research progress in the microbial community and its functional characteristics in activated sludge systems[J]. INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 35(3): 5-9.

张姿, 汤兵. 活性污泥系统中微生物菌群及其功能特性的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2015, 35(3): 5-9.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://www.iwt.cn/EN/10.11894/1005-829x.2015.35(3).005

https://www.iwt.cn/EN/Y2015/V35/I3/5

References

[1] 洪安安, 刘德华, 刘灿明. 活性污泥的主要微生物菌群及研究方法[J]. 工业水处理, 2009, 29(2): 10-14.
[2] 付欢. 论活性污泥微生物指示作用[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2013, 8: 62-67.
[3] Manefield M, Griffiths R I, Leigh M B, et al. Functional and compositional comparison of two activated sludge communities remediating coking effluent[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 7(5): 715-722.
[4] Sanguin H, Sarniguet A, Gazengel K, et al. Rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with disease suppressiveness stages of take-all decline in wheat monoculture[J]. New Phytologist, 2009, 184(3): 694-707.
[5] Siripong S, Rittmann B E. Diversity study of nitrifying bacteria in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(5): 1110-1120.
[6] Wang Liangming, Chien I C, Yuan Shilung, et al. Nitrifying commu-nity structures and nitrification performance of full-scale municipal and swine wastewater treatment plants[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 75 (2): 234 -242.
[7] 赵翠娟, 宋文军, 朱高雄. 除氨氮菌在污水处理中的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2013(2): 31-34.
[8] 袁怡, 黄勇, 李祥. 工业废水反硝化技术研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2013, 33(4): 1-5.
[9] Dytczak M A, Londry K L, Oleszkiewicz J A. Nitrifying genera in ac-tivated sludge may influence nitrification rates[J]. Water Environ-mental Research, 2008, 80(5): 388-396.
[10] 朱海霞, 陈林海, 张大伟, 等. 活性污泥微生物菌群研究方法进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(1): 314-322.
[11] 朱铁群, 李凯慧, 张杰. 活性污泥驯化的微生物生态学原理[J]. 微生物学通报, 2008, 35(6): 939-943.
[12] Zhang Bin, Sun Baosheng, Ji Min, et al. Population dynamic suc-cession and quantification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(1/2/3): 796-803.
[13] 苗志加, 彭永臻, 王淦, 等. 强化生物除磷工艺富集聚磷菌及其微生物菌群分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013, 39(5): 742-748.
[14] Nielsen P H, Mielczarek A T, Kragelund C, et al. A conceptual ecosystem model of microbial communities in enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(17): 5070-5088.
[15] Mielczarek A T, Nguyen H T T, Nielsen J L, et al. Population dy-namics of bacteria involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal in Danish wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(4): 1529-1544.
[16] Lin C K, Kateyama Y, Hosomi M, et al. The characteristics of the bacterial community structure and population dynamics for phosphorus removal in SBR activated sludge processes[J]. Water Re-search, 2003, 37(12): 2944-2952.
[17] Wang Xiuheng, Zhang Kun, Ren Nanqi, et al. Monitoring microbial community structure and succession of an A/O SBR during start-up period using PCR-DGGE[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 21(2): 223-228.
[18] Zou Hua, Du Guocheng, Ruan Wenquan, et al. Role of nitrate in biological phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor[J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 22(7): 701-706.
[19] 周康群, 刘晖, 孙彦富, 等. 反硝化聚磷菌的SBR反应器中微生物种群与浓度变化[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 39(4): 705-711.
[20] 刘立, 汤兵, 黄绍松, 等. 反硝化聚磷菌快速富集培养及其荧光原位杂交技术鉴别[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(7): 2869-2875.
[21] Rani A, Porwal S, Sharma R, et al. Assessment of microbial diversity in effluent treatment plants by culture dependent and culture independent approaches[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(15): 7098-7107.
[22] Xia Siqing, Jia Renyong, Feng Fan, et al. Effect of solids retention time on antibiotics removal performance and microbial communities in an A/O-MBR process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 106: 36-43.
[23] Liang Duan, Ivan M A, Huang Chunlin, et al. Effects of short solids retention time on microbial community in a membrane bioreactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(14): 3489-3496.
[24] Ahmed Z, Lim B R, Cho J, et al. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal and changes in microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor: effect of different carbon sources[J]. Water Re-search, 2008, 42(1/2): 198-210.
[25] Mormile M R, Macauley J J, Adams C D. Diversity of tet resistance genes in tetracycline-resistant bacteria isolated from a wine lagoon with low antibiotic impact[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2007, 53(12): 1307-1315.
[26] 霍炜洁, 肖晶晶, 黄亚丽, 等. 微生物技术修复水污染的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2008(4): 94-98.
[27] 周鑫淼, 陈洁君, 耿立召, 等. 邻苯二酚2,3-双加氧酶的结构和功能研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2007(4): 51-54.
[28] Táncsics A, Szabó I, Baka E, et al. Investigation of catechol 2, 3-dioxygenase and 16S rRNA gene diversity in hypoxic, petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2010, 33(7): 398-406.
[29] Sun Bozhi, Ko K, Ramsay J A. Biodegradation of 1, 4-dioxane by a Flavobacterium[J]. Biodegradation, 2011, 22(3): 651-659.
[30] Wexler M, Bond P L, Richardson D J, et al. A wide host-range me-tagenomic library from a wastewater treatment plant yields a novel alcohol/aldehyde dehydrogenase[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 7(12): 1917-1926.
[31] 秦华明, 莫测辉. 聚丙烯酰胺微生物降解研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2007(6): 121-125.
[32] 金若菲, 周集体, 王竟, 等. 膜生物反应器中的生物学特性[J]. 微生物学通报, 2004, 31(2): 121-125.
[33] Jiang Jianguo, Wu Shenggui, Shen Yunfen. Effects of seasonal succession and water pollution on the protozoan community structure in an eutrophic lake[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(3): 523-532.
[34] Nicolau A, Dias N, Mota M, et al. Trends in the use of protozoa in the assessment of wastewater treatment[J]. Research Microbiology, 2001, 152(7): 621-630.
[35] Martín-Cereceda M, Pérez-Uz B, Serrano S, et al. Dynamics of protozoan and metazoan communities in a full scale wastewater treatment plant by rotating biological contactors[J]. Microbiological Research, 2001, 156(3): 225-238.
[36] Liu Juan, Yang Min, Qi Rong, et al. Comparative study of protozoan communities in full-scale MWTPs in Beijing related to treatment processes[J]. Water Research, 2008, 42(8/9): 1907-1918.
[37] Dubber D, Gray N F. The influence of fundamental design parame-ters on ciliates community structure in Irish activated sludge systems[J]. European Journal of Protistology, 2011, 47(4): 274-286.
[38] Wang Yulan, Yu Shuili, Shi Wenxin, et al. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(17): 3877-3881.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export