摘要:
采用UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2体系预处理皮革废水,考察了初始pH、反应时间、H2O2和Fe-EDTA投量对COD去除率的影响,测定了处理过程中B/C变化,同时与UV/Fenton法进行了比较。结果表明:UV/Fenton法的最佳工艺条件为FeSO425mmol/L、H2O2300mmol/L、pH=5。加入EDTA后,反应的最佳初始pH碱移,UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2体系于pH为8.0时,反应10minCOD去除率可达51.9%,而pH为5.0时UV/Fenton体系处理10min后COD去除率仅37.9%。对比降解效果,UV单独作用效果不理想,60min后COD去除率仅25%。引入UV后,Fenton法处理效果提高,60min后COD去除率由37.0%提高至59.3%,加入EDTA后最终COD去除率与UV/Fenton法接近。经光照处理的废水B/C呈先降后升趋势,经UV/Fenton处理后,原水B/C由0.3提高至0.35,经UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2处理的废水最终B/C略有降低。
关键词:
光氧化技术,
皮革废水,
可生化性
Abstract:
An advanced oxidation process applying EDTA in UV/Fenton system has been used for degrading the pollutants contained in tannery wastewater. The effect of initial pH,H2O2 and Fe-EDTA dosage are investigated and the biodegradability changes of the pretreatment system of UV/Fenton and UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2 are compared. The results show that the best conditions are as follows:FeSO4 25 mmol/L,H2O2 300 mmol/L,pH=5. After adding EDTA,the best initial pH moves towards alkaline. When the pH is 8.0,UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2 reacts for 10 min,the COD removal rate can reach 51.9%,while the pH is 5.0,after being treated by UV/Fenton process for 10 min,the COD removal rate is only 37.9%. Various degrading efficiencies are compared. The results show that when UV is used alone,the result is not so good. After 60 min,the COD removal rate is only around 25%. After introducing UV,the treatment efficiency of Fenton process is obviously improved:in 60 min increasing from 37% to 59.3%. After adding EDTA,the final COD removal rate is similar to the efficiency of UV/Fenton process. The radiated wastewater B/C appears increasing first then decreasing afterwards. After being treated by UV/Fenton process,the raw water improves from 0.3 to 0.35. After being treated by UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2,it declines a little.
Key words:
photooxidation process,
tannery wastewater,
biodegradability
中图分类号:
周作明, 董梅霞, 李天鹏, 荆国华. 碱性条件下UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2预处理皮革废水[J]. 工业水处理, 2009, 29(9): 58-61,62.
Zhou Zuoming, Dong Meixia, Li Tianpeng, Jing Guohua. Pretreatment of tannery wastewater by UV/Fe-EDTA/H2O2 process under alkaline conditions[J]. INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT, 2009, 29(9): 58-61,62.