工业水处理 ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 43-46. doi: 10.11894/1005-829x.2005.25(4).45

• 试验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

化学/生物联合工艺处理城市污水研究

侯红娟, 王洪洋, 李彤, 周琪   

  1. 同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室 上海 200092
  • 出版日期:2005-04-20 发布日期:2010-10-01
  • 作者简介:侯红娟(1975- ),同济大学在读博士研究生,研究方向为水污染控制。
  • 基金资助:

    国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划):城市污水处理与资源化技术研究及工程示范项目,编号:2002AA601023

Study on municipal wastewater treatment by chemical and biological process

Hou Hongjuan, Wang Hongyang, Li Tong, Zhou Qi   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Reuse, Tongji University, Shangha 200092, China
  • Online:2005-04-20 Published:2010-10-01

摘要:

采用聚合硅酸铁混凝剂,直接投加到反应器中(即投加混凝剂活性污泥法),考察其对COD、氮、磷的去除效果,并与对生物反应器出水再进行混凝沉淀(即后混凝法)进行对比。结果表明:投加混凝剂活性污泥法,COD和TN的去除率略有提高,但两种工艺没有明显的区别;后混凝法对TP的去除率略高于投加混凝剂活性污泥法,但其出水中铁离子的含量远高于投加混凝剂活性污泥法,且需要增加一套混凝、沉淀设备,因此直接将混凝剂投加到生物反应器中比较适合于辅助除磷。

关键词: 聚合硅酸铁, 除磷脱氮, 化学除磷, 生物除磷

Abstract:

As a kind of coagulant, polyferric silicate is used to compare the remo val effects on COD, nitrogen, and phosphorus in feeding coagulant into biologica l reactor directly(feeding coagulant activated sludge process) with that of feeding coagulant into the bioreactor effluent(post-coagulating pro cess). Results indicate that the removal efficiency of COD and TN increases a little but there is no distinct dif ference between the two kinds of processes. The removal efficiency for TP of pos t-coagulating process is a little higher than that of feeding coagulant activate d sludge process, while the concentration of Fe ion in the former process, which also needs a series of equipment for coagulating and settling, is far stronger than that in latter process. So it is suitable for accessorial phosphorus remova l to feed coagulant into the bioreactor.

Key words: polyferric silicate, nitrogen and phosphorus removal, chemical phospho rus removal, biological phos-phorus removal

中图分类号: